Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati terhadap Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo Nomor : 181/PID.B/2020/PN.SKH)

Nurhayati, Putri and Mahmud, Hadi (2023) Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati terhadap Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo Nomor : 181/PID.B/2020/PN.SKH). Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati terhadap Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo Nomor : 181/PID.B/2020/PN.SKH), 16 (1). pp. 47-57. ISSN 1693-0819

Text 05-jan-putri-nurhayati.pdf Download (290kB)

Abstract

The crime of premeditated murder is an act of violating a person's right to life. Premeditated murder is carried out with advance planning with the aim of destroying the lives of other people, which is based on Article 340 of the Criminal Code, which imposes a death penalty/life imprisonment for a maximum of 20 years for the perpetrator of the crime. Indonesia is a country where the death penalty is enforced. The death penalty is the most severe punishment for the perpetrators of crimes imposed by the panel of court judges. The research uses an empirical juridical method with an approach to secondary data then uses primary data research which refers to the Criminal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, and the Decision of the Sukoharjo District Court Number 181/Pid.B/2020/PN.Skh.p The implementation of the death penalty is legally enforced in Indonesia. In passing the decision, the panel of judges used three planning criteria as a reference in the judge's considerations, namely the perpetrator's intention, preparatory actions, and a systematic way of working which was deemed to have been fulfilled by the perpetrators of the crime.

Actions (login required)

View Item